【Blog｜部落格】Blog Disclaimer｜關於版權的問題

May 30, 2016, Monday

Definitely no Monday blue today, but it wasn't until I received this email......

**************************************************************************

今天是星期一，但是我的星期一不藍藍，直到我收到這一封郵件。。。

I was like..."AGAIN??" This is about movie post and the one received last time was about movie too... That one it can explained that because I've given very bad reviews on that movie.

But this one was completely different, here is the blog post but I've already remove everything basically, I've no idea why, but the only reason I can find out maybe is the Chinese version of synopsis that I didn't give credit to specify it is from the Chinese version of Wikipedia but not the English one. Besides those, I seriously couldn't find any single thing that is belongs to anyone. Or maybe I could say is the movie poster, but that one I did give credit to the sources states where's the image came from. Else...the YouTube trailer link, is that really matter??

Seriously I don't know why...and the most suspicious thing is I only got roughly 250 readers on that post...I'm so really wonder why and where I got involved into the Copyright thing...Thus, lesson learned this time, my movie review thing will be just keep as simple as I can without any official info attached to that.

By the way, I was thinking could it be the drawing picture?? Ohh, come on......I'm the one who drew that, unless I gone crazy to sue myself =.=

**************************************************************************

回顧最上一封也是關於電影的，我已經少寫電影了，而且這一封中的又是電影（我是跟電影有仇嗎？）上一封我可以清楚明白的理解是因為我把那該部電影寫得很差。

但是事隔一年多的這一篇，我幾乎都頭大了，都不知道哪來的侵權？？ 唯一可以勉強說得上來的是最後的華語劇情下面，我只放了英語的維基百科網址，而忘了放維基百科的華語版本。 又或者是那電影海報的那張照片，但是我又有特別註明是取自於那裡的。 又或者是。。。那YouTube的預告片。。。我都快無語了。。。

更加離奇的是我那一篇才僅有的250多位讀者，到底是誰會那麼閒空的說我侵權？？ 所以未免再得到第三封，我相信以後的電影觀後感，我會有多簡短就簡短。。。

哦，對了！ 或許他／她說我侵權是那唯一沒有註明的照片，嘿！ 那是我自己畫的，好嗎？ 除非我是神經質地去自己告自己吧！

Posts on this date -